Search for: "Marks v. United States Postal Service" Results 1 - 20 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm by Morris Turek
  This is not surprising since there are approximately 180,000 mailboxes of this type located across the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 6:17 pm by Sme
United States Postal Service (10th Cir., November 2, 2018) (reversing dismissal based on lack of jurisdiction and remanding for dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies)*Cases marked with an asterisk are 10th Circuit cases the court declared not to be binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 11:53 am by Karen Monteith
  The Court applied the test for a public authority, as clarified by the Federal Court of Appeal in United States Postal Service v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Crimes and offenses against the laws regulating the postal service of both countries, with respect to using the mails to promote frauds. 27. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 7:44 am by Cody M. Poplin
For the first time since February, proceedings in military commissions case United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, in which they will consider whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 2:49 am
("HCI") sought a concurrent use registration for the mark HANSCOMB CONSULTING & Design (shown below) for various business services, covering the entire United States except for two geographical areas (Hinsdale, Illinois and Los Angeles, California). [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
’ Declaration of Mark Keenheel, attached to § 2255 Motion as Exhibit 2 at ¶ 2.U.S. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, the court held 6-3 that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act. [read post]